Third Party Vendors May Put Healthcare Facilities at Risk for Cyberattacks 

Third-party vendors are becoming a possible vector for cyberattacks.

By Jeff Wardon, Jr., Assistant Editor


Cyberattacks and data breaches continue to hammer healthcare facilities. As they do, facility managers are tasked with keeping watch on where sensitive data is being shared on an around-the-clock basis.  

Another avenue for attackers is becoming increasingly clear: third-party vendors. 

According to Cook County Health’s (CCH) press release, Perry Johnson & Associates (PJ&A), Inc., a third-party vendor CCH shared information with for medical transcription services, notified CCH that there was a data breach on PJ&A’s systems that involved some of their patient data. After learning this, CCH cut off its ties to PJ&A.  

Third-party vendors can be a potential vector for cyberattacks, as seen in the large chain of healthcare attacks due to a MOVEit software vulnerability. Since healthcare facilities actively share information with these vendors, a data breach at the vendor’s systems can expose sensitive patient information.  

However, either at the source or the third-party level, this data can be accessed by other individuals if they breach the systems. This is done through cyber bots breaching these organizations’ systems to assess the value of and extract the data from the system, creating what Charlie Regan, chief executive officer at Nerds On Site, calls “data drip.” 

“We can go into a company and find out in 15 minutes you have got data going at 195,000 drips of data every minute,” Regan previously told Healthcare Facilities Today. “You have got some going to Poland, you have got some going to North Korea and you have got some going to South Africa. You have clients, trusted suppliers or trusted stakeholders in any of those arenas. If not, then you know that you are experiencing data drip.” 

Regan also adds that healthcare facilities can take what is known as a zero-trust approach, where any party who wishes to access an organization’s resources is immediately deemed untrustworthy. For these parties to access the resources, they would have to pass a series of checks to verify who they are, such as multifactor authentication (MFA). 

Regan further says that facilities managers must keep an ever-watchful eye on their data drip, even keeping an eye on what third-party vendors that healthcare facilities share their data with.  

Jeff Wardon, Jr. is the assistant editor for the facilities market. 



October 18, 2023


Topic Area: Information Technology , Safety , Security


Recent Posts

ISSA Introduces Healthcare Platform to Advance Safer, Cleaner Patient Environments

This new resource integrates training, research and cross-sector collaboration to raise care standards and improve patient outcomes.


Third-Party Tracking Settlement is a Compliance Wake-Up Call for Healthcare Facilities Managers

Mount Sinai Health System agrees to a $5.3 million settlement to resolve claims it improperly shared patient data with Facebook through tracking tools.


ECU Health Behavioral Health Hospital Hosts Ribbon-Cutting Ceremony for New Facility

The new facility features 144 beds and a healing environment for behavioral health patients.


Aspire Rural Health System Reports Data Security Incident

Upon detecting the unauthorized activity, Aspire immediately worked to contain the incident and launched a thorough investigation.


Fatal Flaws: Strategies for Active Attackers

Anything that goes wrong with the response is the liability exposure of the organization — not the employee and not the police.


 
 


FREE Newsletter Signup Form

News & Updates | Webcast Alerts
Building Technologies | & More!

 
 
 


All fields are required. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.